|
한, 예상이 가능한 결말을 관객들에게 선사함으로써 관객들을 만족시키지만, 사실은 이러한 모든 것이 허상이라는 아이러니 또한 내포하고 있습니다. 왜냐하면 관객들은 상징적인 해결을 원하며, 거기서 오는 쾌감을 느끼기 위해 극장을 찾
|
|
|
Story (Ph. D. dissertation, Westminster Theological Seminary, 1996)
_________________ , 설교를 돕는 분석 요한복음, (서울: 규장, 1999) Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
II. 요한이 사용한 “믿음”이라는 동사의 용법에 대해
1. “믿는다”(pisteu,w)의 용례
2. 요한의 표현
|
|
|
Story (Edinburgh:T. & T. Clark,1983).
R.P. Martin, Mark : Evangelist and Theologian (Exeter : Partnoster Press, 1972).
R.Tannehill,"The Gospel of Mark as a Narrative Christology "(semeia/16,1979).
R.H. Fuller,Who is Christ(Philadelphia:Fortress Press,1983).
G. Kittel, theological dictionary of the
|
|
|
story Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1984.
Karris, R. Luke: Artist and Theologian. Luke's Passion Account As Literature New York: Paulist, 1985.
Kelber, W. H. Mark's Story of Jesus Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1979.
Kingsbury, J. D. Jesus Christ in Matthew, Mark, and Luke Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 198
|
|
|
tist Church, 1931.
Dosker, Henry Elias. The Dutch Anabaptists. Philadelphia: The Judson Press, 1921.
Estep, William R. The Anabaptist Story: An Introduction to Sixteenth Century Anabaptism. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1975, 1996.
________. 『재침례교도의 역사』. 정수영 역.
|
|
|
CONVERSATION BETWEEN CALVIN AND BERNARD OF CLAIRVAUX ON SOTERIOLOGY
Introduction
Although Calvin criticized severely the mysticism of the Middle Ages, he respected Bernard of Clairvaux, who was a mystic in the Middle Ages. He often quoted the writings of Bernard in his works. Bernard was one of t
|
|
|
story. After that, I will discuss applications of the results for our current churches. This study will, at first, refer to primary sources. In addition, I will consult secondary works to find other theologians’ reviews and opinions. In doing this I will be able to keep my balance of objectivity.
T
|
|
|
HISTORICAL STUDY ON THE REASON OF ICONOCLASTIC CONTROVERSY: THEOLOGICAL AND POLITICAL USE
Introduction
Iconoclastic controversy is a well known matter of church history. It sacrificed so many people’s lives and the unity of the church. Therefore, it is necessary for us to know why the controversy
|
|
|
Philadelphia; Fortress Press. 1971.
Ricoeur, Paul, Freud and Philosophy; An Essay on Interpretation. Trans. D. Savage, New Haven; Yale University Press. 1970.
"Creativity in Language; Word, Polysemy, Metaphor." Philosophy Today, 17; 97-111. 1973.
The Conflict of Interpretations; Essays in Hermene
|
|
|
story. The church, which had a privilege in the middle ages, had difficulties for reforming itself. It was monastic movements that strove to reform the church. After that, I will apply the result of the study to current Protestant churches, which are suffering the same problems, which the Roman Chu
|
|
메뉴펼치기
